III. Development of Northern and Inuit Broadcasting
In the early 1980s, it became quite obvious that the
creation of a more equitable system of access to media
and communication technologies was a priority. This New
World Information Order was based on the 1978 report of
UNESCO's International Commission for the Study of
Communication Problems, known as the MacBride
Commission after its president Sean MacBride.
For many years, the cultural and financial dependence
of developing areas on dominant economic powers (such
as the US or southern Canada) had hindered the
development of the type of local television that might
have had the potential to better serve the interests of
viewers. According to the MacBride Commission, equal
opportunities in communication were part of the basic
human rights in the same way as freedom of expression.
Besides, it was urgent for developing areas to be given
the technological and financial means to produce their
own programming and thus preserve their cultures and
identities with a greater independence and self-reliance
concerning television production.
Regarding the Canadian North, this chapter aims first
at considering the arguments for the development of an
Inuit broadcasting system, then at examining the Canadian
government's attitude toward Aboriginal broadcasting by
comparison with New Zealand. Finally, it offers an
account of the development of Inuit and Aboriginal
broadcasting in the Canadian North as a consequence of
the New World Information Order.
A) Arguments for the Development of Inuit Broadcasting in the North
Inuit Interests
The most important argument for the development
of an Inuit broadcasting system was clearly the
preservation of Inuit interests. In this respect, Inuit
broadcasting came as a response to help mitigate the
damaging effects of television studied in chapter two but
also to restore their place in Canadian society.
To begin with, thanks to home-made programs an
Inuit broadcasting system could promote the preservation
and strengthening of Inuit's ancestral culture, enrich
Inuit's cultural and social fabric, provide positive role
models as well as make sure that Inuktitut remains a living
language spoken by all the Inuit. In October 1998, when
Canadians were invited to express their views concerning
TVNC's application for the Aboriginal Peoples Television
Network, Shellene Moore, a "supporter of aboriginal
communication philosophies" as she terms herself,
addressed the CRTC as follows:
Our language is a very important element in preserving the distinctness of being Aboriginal people. Both language and culture depend on the survival of our spirituality, knowledge of the sea and land harvesting skills, healing traditions, intellectual and cultural properties promoted and protected, if not by the appropriate political entities then by each and every aboriginal person using their own words.(1)
A network providing a relevant and in-depth Inuit
point of view could help Inuit to interpret local, national
and international issues and events in the context of their
own understanding in order for them to readily
appreciate the implications of the Euro-Canadian way of
living and the developments taking place in the North.
Northern communities are quite isolated from one
another in Nunavut (making up one third of Canada's land
mass): the only way in or out of settlements is by plane
(or snowmobile) and these huge distances make
electronic media such as television of vital importance to
the development of improved communication between
Inuit and between Northerners. Television could provide
a virtual forum to exchange and vehicle their ideas,
contribute to the national and international flow of
information and exercise their right to freedom of
expression.
An Inuit broadcasting system also meant employing
Inuit in the planning, production and distribution of their
own television programs, providing them with training
opportunities and communication technologies.
All in all, we can say that according to Daniel Lerner's
criteria, Inuit broadcasting would enable Inuit to express
themselves and to take their own place as "participants"
in the Canadian nation, or in other words to become citizens.
The Northern Market
Television is not only considered in terms of audience
but also in terms of consumer market: viewers are above
all consumers, they consume goods and services and
television is one of them.
First of all, if we study the market of television in the
Canadian North, it appears that CBC had a de facto
monopoly in the early 1980s. There was absolutely no
alternative service for the Northwest Territories' sixty
communities and 42,800 inhabitants whereas southern
Canadians enjoyed at least three channels and most of the
time twenty thanks to cable television (and American
networks). As a result, there was a severe imbalance as
far as pluralism was concerned between the North and
the South.
The absence of private competitors such as CTV was
due to a persistent misconception: the Northern market
was theoretically too small and too spread out for
commercial television operators. According to the
Northern News Services website (NNS Market Data,
http://www.nnsl.com, 1999), the North is a much bigger
potential market than many realise and to some extent it
has been a neglected market:
- Disposable income of many [Qablunait] Northerners is far above the national average because of the high wages paid. This creates a particularly attractive market for luxury and semi-luxury products.
- Distribution systems are in place. Getting products to dealers or consumers is not nearly as complex as many suppose. [...]
- Northern consumers buy far more per capita of some products than do their Southern cousins.
In these conditions, a commercial television channel
including both Inuktitut-regional programs and English-mainstream programs can be profitable. This argument is
supported by the splintering of the mass-market model. CBC North (Radio) in the 1980s
The splintering of the mass market model suggests
that the notion of a television network being created to
appeal to audiences on a universal level began to decline
in the early 1980s with the development (in the US) of
services targeting special interest groups. The aim was to
gain better marketing or advertising opportunities to
these groups. Such services were either thematic (e.g.
Cable News Network, Music Television) or ethnic (e.g.
Black Entertainment Television).
Black Entertainment Television
(BET) was launched by
former vice president of government relations for the
National Cable Television Association, Robert L. Johnson
in January 1980. It was created to serve the specific
interests of the African-American community by
"delivering quality entertainment, information,
merchandise and leisure time activity to the growing
African-American marketplace".(2)
Today, BET Holdings Inc. , one of the leading Black-owned and Black-operated media companies in the US,
operates five cable channels but also businesses outside
the cable industry such as a publishing division or
restaurants. In addition to Black Entertainment Television
(56 million subscribers in January 1999), BET Holdings
Inc. launched four other channels targeting African-American consumers but also foreign markets such as
Europe and Asia. For instance, BET on Jazz, a 24-hour jazz
programming service launched in January 1996, reaches
1.5 million international subscribers (it is available in
France through the TPS DTH (Direct-To-Home) satellite
package and cable networks).
Black Entertainment Television
has proved that an
ethnic television channel is not necessarily a cultural
ghetto and can become a fantastic show case (e.g. BET on
Jazz). It has also demonstrated that it is possible for a
commercial television channel to target a specific
community within a given nation provided the consumer
market is large enough to attract the advertising manna
(in addition to subscription fees). However, when the
consumer market is not large enough, there is another
option to secure the necessary financial means: public financing.
CBC North's organisation is the perfect example of what should have been done with television: it proves that Northern broadcastings in Inuktitut can be successful provided the necessary funds (CAN$ 12,000,000) are raised.
As soon as the late 1970s, satellite technology made it possible to broadcast local and specific programs in Northern communities. First, the national network's signal was being delivered to one of the four regional production centres:
- CBC Western Arctic- Inuvik, NWT (service in English, Gwich'in, Inuvialuktun)
- CBC Mackenzie-Yellowknife, NWT (service in English, Dogrib, North Slavey, South Slavey and Chipewyan)
- CBC Eastern Arctic-Iqaluit(Frobisher Bay), NWT (service in English and Inuktitut)
- CBC Yukon-Whitehorse, YU (service in English and Gwich'in-Loucheux)
later joined by:
- CBC Kivalliq-Rankin Inlet, NWT (service in English and Inuktitut)
- SRC Nord Québec-Kuujjuaq, PQ (service in French and Cree)
Then, the regional production centre could beam its
signal to the satellite which would bounce it back to any
receiving station where it was redistributed throughout
the local community by a low power relay transmitter. As
a consequence, the Inuit audience could receive not only
live national CBC programming but also regional and
most of the time local programming. For instance, CBC
Eastern Arctic in Iqaluit would produce ten hours a day of
regional and local programs and more than half of it was
in Inuktitut, including on prime-time. The Inuktitut
programming featured current affairs shows, phone-in
shows, a full range of newscasts, shows about old legends
exploring Inuit's oral tradition) and even recipes.
Concerning community stations, CBC would provide
the basic studio, the maintenance and a training program
for volunteer announcers, whereas the community (with
help from the territorial government) was in charge of the
operating expenses.
This radio system and above all access community
broadcasts enjoyed a great success and this model of
public multi-local broadcasting was certainly the most
appropriate for a Northern television network. It was
possible and not that costly.